Document Details

Document Type : Thesis 
Document Title :
Penalty Judgment A comparative study in Islamic jurisprudence & on some contemporary legal systems
الحكــم الجزائــي دراســـــــة مقارنــــــة في الفقـــه الإسلامــي وبعضـــاً مــن الأنظمــة الوضعيــة
 
Subject : Penalty Judgment A comparative study in Islamic jurisprudence & on some contemporary legal systems 
Document Language : Arabic 
Abstract : The jurisdiction is the integrity of Islamic sciences, the most important topic and the rules and objectives for the attention of the separation of disputes and enforcement of legitimacy judgments to the events in order to protect the five colleges and fancies of errors. The penal judgment is a branch of this science, also has several branches with some elements and some conditions and some species, and can not take its shape and become a title of the truth, so long as no meets these branches and then announce to become the fixed juridical truth before the judicial courts. The research is a comparative study between Islamic jurisprudence, and some Arab regimes, and has included a preliminary introduction and two chapters. The researcher enter into the subject of the study in Chapter I, knowing the penal judgment, and its components in Islamic jurisprudence and civil law, with review to definition it with the Saudi regime, and illustrate the impression of this definition, this chapter ended with clarifying the requirements of judgment indicating its conditions in Islamic jurisprudence comparing with civil laws. The second Chapter II including the appeal ways in penal judgment, and to define these roads is necessary to know the types of judgment in Islamic jurisprudence and law, then the ways of regular appeal and ways of irregular appeal. The researcher concluded his study with results, one of its important was mainly influenced by the Saudi regime in particular, and the Arab regimes in general with the rules of Islamic jurisprudence concerning the judgment on its conditions, noting the differences between the terminology and expressions, and the judicial ruling was in fact is obliged by legitimate rule or legal base has stemmed from Convinced of the judge who had a right to his conviction was therefore in contravention of sentencing is not ultimately passed therefore appealed against specific ways both in Islamic jurisprudence or in the civil laws to rectify the situation might mar by the mistakes and a desire to attain the completeness truth. 
Supervisor : Dr. 
Thesis Type : Master Thesis 
Publishing Year : 1429 AH
2007 AD 
Added Date : Saturday, March 21, 2009 

Researchers

Researcher Name (Arabic)Researcher Name (English)Researcher TypeDr GradeEmail
إبراهيم سليمان الغامديAL-GAHMDE, IBRAHEEM SULIMANResearcherMaster 

Files

File NameTypeDescription
 19225.pdf pdf 

Back To Researches Page